Which of these options is NOT a true advantage of Kinesis over SQS?
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. D.Correct answer: D.
Option A is incorrect because this statement is correct.
Option B is incorrect because this statement is correct.
Option C is incorrect because this statement is correct.
Option D is CORRECT because as the question says, this was the only false statement.
Kinesis does not have this capability.SQS tracks the successful and failed messages, SQS will delete successful messages and redeliver failed messages after a visibility timeout.
More details:
https://aws.amazon.com/kinesis/data-streams/faqs/Amazon Kinesis and Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS) are both messaging services provided by AWS that enable decoupling of application components, allowing for greater scalability and reliability. However, there are several key differences between the two services.
Option B is NOT a true advantage of Kinesis over SQS.
Amazon Kinesis is a real-time data streaming service that is designed to handle high-volume, high-speed data streams. It can capture and process data in real-time, making it well-suited for use cases such as real-time analytics, machine learning, and Internet of Things (IoT) data processing.
On the other hand, Amazon SQS is a message queuing service that enables decoupling and asynchronous communication between application components. SQS is designed to handle messages in a distributed environment, making it well-suited for use cases where reliability and fault-tolerance are important.
Here are some of the advantages of Kinesis over SQS:
A. Partition key-based routing: With Kinesis, data records can be routed to specific shards using a partition key. This enables you to control the ordering of messages and to ensure that related messages are processed by the same consumer application. In contrast, with SQS, messages are sent to a queue and consumed in a first-in, first-out (FIFO) order. You cannot control the order in which messages are consumed.
C. Maintaining order of log statements: Kinesis is designed to maintain the order of log statements, making it well-suited for use cases where maintaining the order of events is critical. In contrast, SQS does not guarantee message order.
D. Tracking successful completion: Kinesis can track the successful completion of each data item independently, which makes it easier to build fault-tolerant applications. With SQS, messages are deleted from the queue as soon as they are consumed, so it can be difficult to determine which messages were processed successfully and which were not.
In summary, the advantages of Kinesis over SQS include the ability to route data records using a partition key, maintain the order of log statements, and track the successful completion of each data item. Option B is NOT a true advantage of Kinesis over SQS.