Gain Upper Management Support for Cloud Architecture Assessment

A.

When presenting a cloud-hosted architecture to upper management, it is important to provide them with information that helps them understand the feasibility and potential benefits of adopting cloud computing.

Option A, a project charter, is a document that outlines the goals, scope, and stakeholders of a project. While this could be useful in providing an overview of the cloud-hosted architecture project, it may not provide enough detail about the technical aspects of the project to persuade upper management to support it.

Option B, a feasibility study, is a comprehensive analysis of the technical, financial, and operational aspects of a project. It considers factors such as resource availability, technical constraints, and potential risks and benefits. A feasibility study can provide upper management with a detailed assessment of the cloud-hosted architecture project, making it a good option to present to them.

Option C, managed services, refers to a type of cloud computing service where a third-party provider manages and maintains the cloud infrastructure on behalf of the customer. While managed services may be a component of the cloud-hosted architecture, presenting it to upper management may not provide enough information about the overall architecture and its potential benefits.

Option D, a pilot, involves implementing a small-scale version of the cloud-hosted architecture project to test its feasibility and identify potential issues before rolling it out on a larger scale. While a pilot may be useful in demonstrating the potential benefits of the cloud-hosted architecture, it may not provide enough information to persuade upper management to support the project.

In summary, the best option to present to upper management would be a feasibility study, as it provides a detailed analysis of the potential benefits and risks of the cloud-hosted architecture project.