CompTIA Security+ Exam SY0-601: Analyst's First Action

Investigating a Virus Infection: What to Do First

Prev Question Next Question

Question

While investigating a virus infection, a security analyst discovered the following on an employee laptop: -> Multiple folders containing a large number of newly released movies and music files -> Proprietary company data -> A large amount of PHI data -> Unapproved FTP software -> Documents that appear to belong to a competitor Which of the following should the analyst do FIRST?

Answers

Explanations

Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer

A. B. C. D.

A.

The situation described in this question indicates a potential security breach, and the security analyst needs to take appropriate action to contain the situation and minimize any damage. The presence of multiple folders containing a large number of newly released movies and music files, unapproved FTP software, and documents that appear to belong to a competitor indicate a possible breach of company policy and potentially even criminal activity. The presence of proprietary company data and PHI data makes this a serious matter that requires prompt action.

Out of the four choices provided, the best first step for the security analyst would be to contact the legal and compliance department for guidance (Option A). This is because the situation described involves a number of complex legal and regulatory issues that require expert guidance. The legal and compliance department will be able to provide the analyst with clear guidelines on how to proceed, and they will also be able to take the necessary steps to ensure that the company is in compliance with all relevant laws and regulations.

Deleting the files, removing the FTP software, and notifying management (Option B) may be necessary, but it should not be the first step taken. This is because there may be legal and regulatory requirements that need to be followed before any action can be taken, and it may also be necessary to preserve evidence for a possible criminal investigation. Deleting the files and removing the FTP software without proper guidance could also cause additional problems, such as accidentally deleting important data or compromising the integrity of the system.

Backing up the files and returning the device to the user (Option C) is not a suitable option, as this could result in further data loss or breaches. Moreover, returning the device to the user without taking appropriate action could lead to further security issues.

Wiping and re-imaging the device (Option D) is an extreme measure and should only be done after all other options have been exhausted. This is because wiping the device will result in the loss of all data, including any evidence that may be needed for a criminal investigation. It is also a time-consuming and costly process, which should only be done if there is no other option available.

In conclusion, the best course of action for the security analyst in this situation would be to contact the legal and compliance department for guidance. This will ensure that all necessary legal and regulatory requirements are followed and that the situation is dealt with in a manner that is both effective and compliant with all relevant laws and regulations.