Preventing Data Exfiltration in GCP Projects
Question
You are the security admin of your company.
Your development team creates multiple GCP projects under the "implementation" folder for several dev, staging, and production workloads.
You want to prevent data exfiltration by malicious insiders or compromised code by setting up a security perimeter.
However, you do not want to restrict communication between the projects.
What should you do?
Answers
Explanations
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. D.B.
The scenario described in the question involves a security admin who wants to prevent data exfiltration in GCP projects created by the development team, without restricting communication between these projects. To achieve this goal, there are several options available, but the most appropriate one depends on various factors, such as the nature of the workloads, the level of security required, and the existing infrastructure.
Let's examine each of the answer options provided in the question and explain their advantages and disadvantages:
A. Use a Shared VPC to enable communication between all projects, and use firewall rules to prevent data exfiltration.
A Shared VPC allows multiple projects to share a common network configuration and resources while maintaining their own separate administrative domains. This approach can simplify network management and reduce the risk of misconfiguration or conflicts. However, Shared VPCs can also introduce complexity and require careful planning to ensure that the right permissions and access controls are in place.
Using firewall rules to prevent data exfiltration is a common practice in GCP, and it can be effective if implemented correctly. Firewall rules can restrict incoming and outgoing traffic based on IP addresses, protocols, ports, and other parameters. However, firewall rules alone may not be sufficient to prevent all types of data exfiltration, especially if the exfiltration is done through legitimate channels or protocols.
In summary, using a Shared VPC and firewall rules can be a reasonable approach to achieve the goal of preventing data exfiltration while enabling communication between projects. However, it may require additional measures, such as data encryption, access controls, and monitoring, to ensure that the security perimeter is effective.
B. Create access levels in Access Context Manager to prevent data exfiltration, and use a shared VPC for communication between projects.
Access Context Manager (ACM) is a GCP service that allows you to define fine-grained access policies based on various contextual attributes, such as the identity of the requester, the resource being accessed, the time of day, and the network location. ACM can help prevent data exfiltration by limiting access to sensitive resources only to authorized users or services.
Using a Shared VPC for communication between projects can provide a unified networking environment while maintaining isolation between projects. However, it may require additional configuration and management overhead compared to a standalone VPC.
In summary, using ACM and a Shared VPC can be an effective approach to preventing data exfiltration while allowing communication between projects. However, it may require careful planning and monitoring to ensure that the access policies are correctly configured and enforced.
C. Use an infrastructure-as-code software tool to set up a single service perimeter and to deploy a Cloud Function that monitors the "implementation" folder via Stackdriver and Cloud Pub/Sub. When the function notices that a new project is added to the folder, it executes Terraform to add the new project to the associated perimeter.
An infrastructure-as-code (IaC) tool, such as Terraform, can automate the deployment and configuration of GCP resources, including service perimeters. By using an IaC tool, you can ensure that the configuration is consistent and auditable and reduce the risk of human error or misconfiguration.
Creating a single service perimeter for all projects can simplify the management and enforcement of access policies and reduce the attack surface. However, it may require more fine-grained access policies to ensure that different workloads have appropriate levels of access.
The Cloud Function that monitors the "implementation" folder can detect new projects and trigger the Terraform deployment to add them to the appropriate service perimeter. This approach can ensure that all projects are included in the security perimeter and reduce the risk of misconfiguration or oversight.
In summary, using an IaC tool and a Cloud Function to automate the deployment and management of service perimeters can be a
