Contracts and Agreements in Alternate Facility Recovery Agreement | SSCP Exam

Unenforceability in Alternate Facility Recovery Agreement

Prev Question Next Question

Question

Contracts and agreements are often times unenforceable or hard to enforce in which of the following alternate facility recovery agreement?

Answers

Explanations

Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer

A. B. C. D.

D.

A reciprocal agreement is where two or more organizations mutually agree to provide facilities to the other if a disaster occurs.The organizations must have similiar hardware and software configurations.

Reciprocal agreements are often not legally binding.

Reciprocal agreements are not contracts and cannot be enforced.

You cannot force someone you have such an agreement with to provide processing to you.

Government regulators do not accept reciprocal agreements as valid disaster recovery sites.

Cold sites are empty computer rooms consisting only of environmental systems, such as air conditioning and raised floors, etc.

They do not meet the requirements of most regulators and boards of directors that the disaster plan be tested at least annually.

Time Brokers promise to deliver processing time on other systems.

They charge a fee, but cannot guaranty that processing will always be available, especially in areas that experienced multiple disasters.

With the exception of providing your own hot site, commercial hot sites provide the greatest protection.Most will allow you up to six weeks to restore your sites if you declare a disaster.They also permit an annual amount of time to test the Disaster Plan.

References: OIG CBK Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Planning (pages 368 - 369) The following answers are incorrect: hot site.

Is incorrect because you have a contract in place stating what services are to be provided.

warm site.

Is incorrect because you have a contract in place stating what services are to be provided.

cold site.

Is incorrect because you have a contract in place stating what services are to be provided.

Contracts and agreements are important components of a successful disaster recovery plan. They establish responsibilities, obligations, and expectations between the parties involved in the recovery process. However, in some cases, these contracts and agreements may be unenforceable or difficult to enforce, depending on the type of alternate facility recovery agreement.

Alternate facility recovery agreements are contracts between two or more organizations that provide for the use of a backup site in the event of a disaster. The four main types of alternate facility recovery agreements are hot sites, warm sites, cold sites, and reciprocal agreements. Each of these agreements has its own advantages and disadvantages, and each may present unique challenges when it comes to enforcing contracts and agreements.

A hot site is a fully equipped backup facility that is ready to take over operations in the event of a disaster. Hot sites typically include all of the hardware, software, and connectivity necessary to resume operations quickly. Because hot sites are fully operational, contracts and agreements are relatively easy to enforce. However, hot sites can be expensive to maintain and may not be cost-effective for all organizations.

A warm site is a backup facility that has some but not all of the equipment needed to resume operations. Warm sites may be less expensive than hot sites, but they may also be more difficult to enforce contracts and agreements because they may require additional setup and configuration before they can be used.

A cold site is a backup facility that has no equipment or infrastructure in place. Cold sites may be less expensive than hot or warm sites, but they may also be more difficult to enforce contracts and agreements because they require significant setup and configuration before they can be used.

A reciprocal agreement is an agreement between two or more organizations to share backup facilities in the event of a disaster. Reciprocal agreements may be cost-effective and flexible, but they may also be more difficult to enforce contracts and agreements because they require coordination and cooperation between the parties involved.

In summary, contracts and agreements may be more or less difficult to enforce depending on the type of alternate facility recovery agreement in place. Hot sites are typically the easiest to enforce, while cold sites and reciprocal agreements may present additional challenges.