When designing a FabricPath environment, which option is considered best practice for the interface connection type between a set of leaf and spine nodes?
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. A. E.D.
In a FabricPath environment, the best practice for the interface connection type between a set of leaf and spine nodes is to use a port channel.
A port channel is a logical interface that combines multiple physical interfaces into a single channel. This provides higher bandwidth, redundancy, and load balancing across the physical links. It also simplifies the configuration and management of the interfaces.
Routed interfaces and port channels are not recommended because they do not provide the necessary redundancy and load balancing that a FabricPath environment requires.
A routed interface is a physical interface that is configured as a Layer 3 interface, which means that it is used to connect to a different network. This type of interface does not support the traffic forwarding and load balancing features that are required in a FabricPath environment.
A routed port channel is a combination of a port channel and a routed interface. While it provides Layer 3 connectivity, it does not provide the necessary redundancy and load balancing that a FabricPath environment requires.
Single interfaces are also not recommended for a FabricPath environment because they do not provide the necessary redundancy and load balancing. Additionally, they can result in suboptimal traffic forwarding and are more difficult to manage.
In summary, a port channel is the recommended interface connection type between a set of leaf and spine nodes in a FabricPath environment because it provides higher bandwidth, redundancy, and load balancing, while also simplifying the configuration and management of the interfaces.