An authorized change to a construction project was implemented.
During the modification, the team identified a defect in which the change caused the building power output to be outside the KPPs.
Which of the following actions should the project manager take?
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. D.B.
294
In this scenario, a change has been authorized to a construction project, but during the implementation of the change, a defect was identified where the building power output is outside the KPPs (Key Performance Parameters).
Here are the possible actions the project manager can take:
A. Submit a new change request: This option involves initiating a new change request to rectify the issue. The project manager may need to engage with the stakeholders to identify the root cause of the defect, propose a solution, and obtain approvals to implement the new change. This option can lead to delays in the project schedule and increased costs due to rework, but it ensures that the project meets the KPPs and delivers the intended value.
B. Initiate the regression plan: This option involves implementing the regression plan to test and validate the changes made during the implementation. The regression plan involves a series of tests to ensure that the change does not have any negative impact on the existing functionality of the project. If the tests reveal that the change has caused a defect in the project, the project manager can initiate corrective action to rectify the issue. This option can help to identify and rectify defects early in the project lifecycle, reducing the cost of rework.
C. Add remediation to the schedule: This option involves adding remediation to the schedule to rectify the issue. The project manager may need to identify the resources required to rectify the issue, estimate the time required to complete the remediation, and add it to the project schedule. This option can help to minimize the impact on the project schedule, but it may not address the root cause of the defect, leading to potential issues in the future.
D. Accept the new power output: This option involves accepting the new power output and continuing with the project. However, this option can lead to the project not meeting the KPPs and failing to deliver the intended value, resulting in dissatisfied stakeholders and potentially, legal implications.
In summary, the best course of action for the project manager would be to submit a new change request to rectify the issue and ensure that the project meets the KPPs and delivers the intended value.