What are three reasons that an organization with multiple branch offices and roaming users might implement a Cisco VPN solution instead of point-to-point WAN links? (Choose three.)
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. D. E. F.BCD
An organization with multiple branch offices and roaming users might implement a Cisco VPN (Virtual Private Network) solution instead of point-to-point WAN (Wide Area Network) links for the following three reasons:
Increased Security: A VPN provides secure communication between different locations over the internet. The data transmitted over a VPN is encrypted and encapsulated, making it difficult for unauthorized users to intercept and access sensitive information. This is particularly important when transmitting sensitive data such as financial or healthcare records.
Reduced Cost: Implementing a VPN solution can be much more cost-effective than deploying point-to-point WAN links. A VPN eliminates the need for dedicated leased lines or other expensive communication links, allowing organizations to use existing internet connections to securely connect remote offices and users.
Scalability: A VPN solution can easily scale to accommodate additional remote users and branch offices without the need for additional physical infrastructure. This can be especially beneficial for organizations with rapidly growing or changing business needs.
While better throughput and reduced latency are also potential benefits of using a VPN solution, they are not the primary reasons that organizations might choose this approach over point-to-point WAN links. Additionally, broadband incompatibility is not a common reason for implementing a VPN solution as most VPN technologies are designed to work with a variety of broadband connections.